February 09, 2010
Ohlsen v. HollenbeckNOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. The truthfulness and accuracy of such information is likely to be in dispute.
Posted July 30th, 2008 by Arthur Bright
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Last updated on September 24th, 2008 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Anonymity
Copyright
Legal Threat
Access to Gov't Information
Trademark
Third-Party Content
Section 230
Criminal
Business Formation
User Comments or Submissions
Newsgathering
SLAPP
Fair Use
Blogs
Free Speech
Elections and Politics
Privacy
Citizen Journalism
Publication of Private Facts
Business Torts
Shield Laws
DMCA
False Light
Access to Courts
Recently Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-09 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati

Re: liable
Not really sure what your take on this is Arthur Bright. However I will assure you everything that was published was also tagged as speculation. This lawsuit was frivolous , and a gross misuse of the judicial system in an effort to execute a personal vendetta against myself and Mr. Hollenbeck . For one the text messages were fabricated. If you take note there is no "phone number" associated to them. Mr. Ohlsen should be brought up on charges of purgery for his actions. Further more seeing that you were able to find the original documentation of this law suit. Perhaps you might dig a little deeper and you will find some fact to what was published to the net. There was never and "conspiracy " against Mr. Ohlsen, other than that which he fabricated in his own mind. This was merely a ploy to attempt to distract the investors from the fact that this business failed of Mr. Olsens own hands and doings, or lack there of. The same goes for his marrage. Please do look further into this matter, There are legitimate avenues you can take to research the validity of the posts that were made that were the root of this lawsuit. Thank you for your time and well written article, however some closing thoughts would clarify the reasoning behind writing it. feel free to contact me at krackerradio at pmlol dot com Mr. Arthur Bright, I would like to speak to you.