February 23, 2012
 |
 |
Peter Senese v Karl HindleNOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. The truthfulness and accuracy of such information is likely to be in dispute. Information contained in this entry is current as of the last event mentioned in the "Description" section below; additional proceedings might have taken place in this matter since this event.
Posted January 3rd, 2011 by Guest
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Last updated on July 11th, 2011 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Anonymity
Copyright
Legal Threat
Access to Gov't Information
Trademark
Third-Party Content
Section 230
User Comments or Submissions
Free Speech
Business Formation
Newsgathering
SLAPP
Criminal
Fair Use
Blogs
False Light
Journalism
CMLP
Social Media
Privacy
Citizen Journalism
Shield Laws
DMCA
Access to Courts
Recently Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati
Print Me!
Send via Email
| Copyright 2007-11 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |
 |
Federal Magistrate Recommendation
By order of Federal Magistrate Judge Roann Mann, the plaintiff's lawsuit is recommended dismissed with the quashing of the arrest warrant and restraining orders including dismissal of the $5 million award.
The New York State Judge, His Honor Judge Schack did not have jurisdiction to issue any orders, having conducted no jurisdictional analysis prior to making his rulings.
Parties are provided until September 26, 2011 to object to the recommendation, whereupon Federal Judge Deary will issue a final ruling.
Karl Hindle
Final Ruling
Federal Judge R Dearie ruled after an objection to the magistrate judge's R&R was filed by Senese on September 26th. The case has been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and the restraining order, order for contempt and warrant for defendant Hindle's arrest have been quashed.
The case is now closed.
Karl Hindle
http://www.karlhindle.com