Note that even in the absence of any relevant cases, you should still consider correcting or retracting an erroneous statement because your willingness to correct past errors in your work will provide several benefits. It will make your work more accurate and reliable, which will increase your credibility, influence, and (hopefully) your page views. It will also diminish the likelihood of your being sued in the first place, as it might placate the potential plaintiff. Furthermore, courts and juries may find a retraction shows your good faith, which will benefit you in a defamation suit.
November 20, 2009
Retraction Law in the District of Columbia
The CMLP has not identified any relevant cases addressing the effect
of a retraction in a defamation case in the District of Columbia. If
you know about a retraction case in the District of Columbia, please contact us. You can find general information in the sections on Correcting or Retracting Your Work After Publication and Practical Tips for Handling Requests to Correct or Remove Material.
Bookmark/Search this post with: Tagged with Last updated on July 24th, 2008 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DisclaimerInformation in this guide is based on general principles of law and is intended for information purposes only; we make no claim as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information. It is not offered for the purpose of providing individualized legal advice. Use of this guide does not create an attorney-client or any other relationship between the user and the Citizen Media Law Project or the Berkman Center for Internet & Society.
Navigation |
|||
| Copyright 2007-09 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati