August 21, 2008
Gilding v. Carr
Posted January 4th, 2008 by swittenauer
Bookmark/Search this post with: Last updated on May 28th, 2008 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Access to Gov't Information
Legal Threat
Business Formation
Copyright
Anonymity
Newsgathering
Third-Party Content
Trademark
Business Torts
SLAPP
CDA 230
Access to Courts
Fair Use
Trade Secrets
Publication of Private Facts
Blogs
Trade Libel
Shield Laws
Intrusion
Criminal
DMCA
Free Speech
False Light
Privacy
Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-2008 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati

More Documents From the Case
Almost all the legal documents filed thus far are available from the Plaintiff's law firm's web site: http://www.azlaw.com/firm-news.php
Truth
Is this site supposed to represent factual, non-biased information? Because it doesn't. The summary claims that the Defendant accuses the Plaintiff of: "harrassing and intimidating a subordinate CPC to death." Well, yes it does, but that isn't at issue in the lawsuit. The complaint does indeed contain that quote, but if you follow the link provided to the actual text you find that the actual quote is this: "This was a man who lied under oath and manipulated the Training Order in order to harass and intimidate a subordinate woman...some say to death." That's quite different. To summarize the essence of the suit with a quote from the Plaintiff which is not only demonstrably false but proved false by a link on the same page, without also summarizing the defense is blatant bias.