November 21, 2009
Gilding v. CarrNOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. The truthfulness and accuracy of such information is likely to be in dispute.
Posted January 4th, 2008 by Stefani Wittenauer
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Last updated on July 1st, 2009 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Anonymity
Copyright
Legal Threat
Access to Gov't Information
Trademark
Third-Party Content
Section 230
SLAPP
Business Formation
User Comments or Submissions
Newsgathering
Criminal
Fair Use
Free Speech
Elections and Politics
Privacy
Publication of Private Facts
Citizen Journalism
Business Torts
Access to Courts
DMCA
False Light
Blogs
Shield Laws
Recently Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-09 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati

More Documents From the Case
Almost all the legal documents filed thus far are available from the Plaintiff's law firm's web site: http://www.azlaw.com/firm-news.php
Truth
Is this site supposed to represent factual, non-biased information? Because it doesn't. The summary claims that the Defendant accuses the Plaintiff of: "harrassing and intimidating a subordinate CPC to death." Well, yes it does, but that isn't at issue in the lawsuit. The complaint does indeed contain that quote, but if you follow the link provided to the actual text you find that the actual quote is this: "This was a man who lied under oath and manipulated the Training Order in order to harass and intimidate a subordinate woman...some say to death." That's quite different. To summarize the essence of the suit with a quote from the Plaintiff which is not only demonstrably false but proved false by a link on the same page, without also summarizing the defense is blatant bias.
A Summary
Blatant bias... seriously? It's a summary, not the full text.