Hudson High School v. Bowler

NOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. The truthfulness and accuracy of such information is likely to be in dispute.

Last updated on November 7th, 2008

Reason for censorship at issue

There is much in the court ruling and the plaintiff's case to support the idea that the posters were removed for reasons unrelated to the website.

1. The website was a minor part of the meeting notice and coud have been covered,
2. Statements made by teachers and staff at school and in the press indicated it was the club's viewpoint that was at issue.
3. The school's own newspaper included the website in two issues AFTER the club was ordered to remove it. The school paper has a teacher sponsor.

The judge picked up on these conflicting facts in her most recent ruling.

   
 
Copyright 2007-09 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted,
content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details.
Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice.