February 12, 2012
Nevyas v. Morgan III (UDRP Action)NOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. The truthfulness and accuracy of such information is likely to be in dispute. Information contained in this entry is current as of the last event mentioned in the "Description" section below; additional proceedings might have taken place in this matter since this event.
Posted August 5th, 2010 by CMLP Staff
Bookmark/Search this post with:
Last updated on February 4th, 2011 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Anonymity
Copyright
Legal Threat
Access to Gov't Information
Trademark
Third-Party Content
Section 230
User Comments or Submissions
Free Speech
Business Formation
Newsgathering
SLAPP
Criminal
Fair Use
Blogs
False Light
Journalism
CMLP
Consumer Ratings and Reviews
Privacy
Citizen Journalism
Shield Laws
DMCA
Access to Courts
Recently Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-11 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati

Nevyases agrees to a consent order giving up their legal claims
Dominic Morgan established a set of web sites at anitanevyaslasik.com, herbertnevyaslasik.com, and nevyaslasik.com to help call consumers' attention to his dissatisfaction with two Philadelphia-based lasik surgeons who, he believes, botched his lasik surgery and hence damaged his eyesight permanently. The surgeons obtained an administrative decision from the National "Arbitration" Forum that took away his domain names on grounds of trademark infringement. Invoking the many court decisions from around the country that have held that domain names about a trademark holder may use the trademark holder's name, decisions that the NAF panelist refused to consider, Public Citizen is representing Morgan in a declaratory judgment action seeking a ruling that his domain names represent non-commercial free speech, truthfully denoting the topic of his web sites.
After the suit for a declaratory action was filed, the Nevyases lost their taste for enforcing their trademark claims given the changes that had been made to the sites during the UDRP proceedings. The Nevyases agreed to a consent order giving up their legal claims.
The consent order is available at the link below:
http://www.citizen.org/documents/Morgan_v_Nevyas_Consent_Order.pdf