December 03, 2008
Thomson Reuters (Scientific) Inc. [EndNote] v. George Mason University [Zotero]
Posted October 10th, 2008 by Guest
Bookmark/Search this post with: Last updated on November 20th, 2008 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Copyright
Anonymity
Newsgathering
Trademark
CDA 230
Access to Gov't Information
Legal Threat
Business Formation
Third-Party Content
SLAPP
Criminal
Fair Use
DMCA
Intrusion
Trade Secrets
Elections and Politics
Trade Libel
Privacy
Publication of Private Facts
Access to Courts
False Light
Business Torts
Shield Laws
Free Speech
Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-08 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati

Ownership of EndNote Style Files
Bruce D'Arcus points to a post in the EndNote forums from a Thomson employee, claiming that they own and can constrain the use and distribution of user-generated style files.
think you mean discreetly,
think you mean discreetly, not discretely.
Thanks
You're right. We've made the fix.