September 05, 2008
Cisneros v. Sanchez
Posted September 10th, 2007 by dardia
Bookmark/Search this post with: Last updated on April 15th, 2008 |
Browse by SubjectDefamation
Access to Gov't Information
Business Formation
Legal Threat
Copyright
Anonymity
Newsgathering
Third-Party Content
Trademark
Business Torts
SLAPP
CDA 230
Access to Courts
Fair Use
Trade Secrets
Publication of Private Facts
Blogs
Trade Libel
Shield Laws
Privacy
Criminal
DMCA
False Light
Intrusion
Free Speech
Updated Threat Entries
Navigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-2008 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati

Sanchez vs Cisneros
I thought I might clarify an important legal issue on this case. This case was in fact removed to the United State District Court on the grounds that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. § 230(c))protected the Defendant from liability. The reason the Federal Judge remanded this case was not because plaintiff was making state law claims, but rather because the Defendant was being sued as the actual author of the defamation. Sanchez was not sued merely for hosting a website. The plaintiffs were able to prove Sanchez used multiple alias names on his site. Sanchez settled this case after the Defendants were able to trace the ip number for the defamatory posting to Sanchez personal laptop computer. This case therefore does not stand for the proposition that an internet service provider can be sued for simply providing a website. I agree that this would, as a matter of public policy, be a very bad idea. Hope this clarifies the Courts' ruling.
Mark Sossi