CanadaLast updated on June 11th, 2008 B.C. Government Claims Copyright in FOI RecordsPosted April 8th, 2008 by Sam BayardMichael Geist points the way to an interesting Vancouver Sun article, reporting on the B.C. provincial government's inclusion of copyright notices in packets of documents turned over to journalists under B.C.'s Freedom of Information and Privacy Protection Act, a Canadian analog of our state FOI laws. Stanley Tromp, writing for the Sun, explains: Soon afterward, I was perplexed to receive "notices" slipped inside packages of documents mailed to me in response to some of my FOI requests. These letters warned me that: "These records are protected by copyright under the federal Copyright Act, pursuant to which unauthorized reproduction of works is forbidden." Bookmark/Search this post with: MediaDefender v. isoHunt.com and GPiO.orgPosted March 27th, 2008 by Jill ButtonAfter internal e-mails from MediaDefender, a company that seeks to prevent the "spread of illegally traded copyrighted material over the Internet and Peer-to-Peer networks," were leaked, the company sent takedown notices to a number of sites that posted and linked to the information, including isoHunt.com, a... read more » Last updated on June 5th, 2008 Global Royalties v. Xcentric VenturesPosted March 6th, 2008 by CMLP StaffGlobal Royalties, Ltd., an international firm that brokers investments in gemstones, sued Xcentric Ventures, Inc., Ed Magedson, and Jane Doe Magedson over three allegedly defamatory posts made by a third... read more » Last updated on June 5th, 2008 Comparative Analysis of Copyright Fair Use in Canada, United Kingdom, and United StatesPosted January 20th, 2008 by David Ardia
Giuseppina D'Agostino, a law professor at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto, has a new paper coming out entitled "Healing Fair Dealing? A Comparative Copyright Analysis of Canadian Fair Dealing to UK Fair Dealing and US Fair Use." Here is the abstract: As a result of the March 4, 2004 Supreme Court of Canada decision in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada for the first time in Canadian copyright history, the court determined that Canadian law must recognize a "user right" to carry on exceptions generally and fair dealing in particular. This paper compares the Canadian fair dealing legislation and jurisprudence to that of the UK and the US. It is observed that because of CCH, the Canadian common law fair dealing factors are more flexible than those entrenched in the US. For the UK, certain criteria have emerged from the caselaw consonant to Canada's pre-CCH framework and in many ways there is now a hierarchy of factors with market considerations at the fore. The real differences, however, ultimately lie in the policy preoccupations held by the respective courts, with Canada's top court alone concerned in championing user rights above all other rights. The paper concludes that Canadian fair dealing does not require too much healing but would benefit from some remedies outside (and complimentary to) the law and the courts. While doing nothing does not seem to be the appropriate response, legal intervention as many advocate may not be warranted either. Rather than, or at the very least together with, reforming the law, establishing fair dealing best practices is most promising. The parties directly affected in a specific industry can together develop these guidelines to ultimately aid in clearer and ongoing fairer fair dealing decision-making in the courts. It is here that US initiatives can serve as most fruitful to emulate.
It's nice to see some scholarly attention paid to the differences between the Canadian, U.K., and U.S. approaches to this important subject. Bookmark/Search this post with: Michael Crook v. BoingBoingPosted January 18th, 2008 by Jill ButtonIn November 2006, BoingBoing reported that its Canadian-based ISP received a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice from Michael Crook requesting that BoingBoing remove a screengrab of him from a Fox News channel program "Hannity and Colmes" that BoingBoing posted on its blog. Crook... read more » Last updated on April 22nd, 2008 Hemming v. NewtonPosted December 12th, 2007 by daniOn May 10, 2006, Nikki Hemmings and Sharman Networks filed a defamation complaint in British Columbia Supreme Court against Jon Newton, the owner and moderator of P2Pnet.net, a Canadian website that tracks news in the peer-to-peer industry. The lawsuit also included claims against Interserver, Inc. (P2Pnet’s Internet Service Provider)... read more » Last updated on June 4th, 2008 Citizen Media Law Podcast #2: Legal Threats Database; Orthomom Defamation Action; Iranian Blogger Sued in CanadaPosted November 2nd, 2007 by Citizen Media L...This week, David Ardia previews our legal threats database, Colin Rhinesmith talks about a recent decision on First Amendment protections for anonymous bloggers, and Sam Bayard spotlights a defamation suit involving an Iranian blogger in Canada.
Music used in this podcast was sampled and remixed from a track titled "Jazz House" by the Wicked Allstars, available on Magnatune. To subscribe to the Citizen Media Law Podcast, visit our Subscriptions page or go directly to the podcast feed. Bookmark/Search this post with: Iranian Blogger Hossein Derakhshan Sued for Defamation in CanadaPosted October 31st, 2007 by Sam BayardHossein Derakhshan, an Iranian-born blogger based in Toronto, reported yesterday that he had been sued for defamation in a Canadian court. Derakhshan is a prominent figure in the history of the Iranian blogosphere. In 2001, he developed the technological solution that enabled Iranian bloggers to blog in Persian and published a widely-used set of instructions on "How to make a blog in Persian" using Blogger.com's free service. (For more information on Derakhshan and the Iranian blogosphere, see Wikipedia's entry on "Iranian blogs" and Meron Rapoport's article, "King of the Iranian Bloggers," on Haaretz.com.) read more » Bookmark/Search this post with: Khalaji v. Derakhshan (Letter)Posted October 31st, 2007 by Sam BayardBlogger Hossein Derakhshan operates two blogs in English and Farsi at www.hoder.com and www.hoder.com/weblog. He wrote a series of blog posts in 2005 criticizing Mohammed Mehdi Khalaji, a fellow at the Washington Instute for Near East Policy. On July 27, 2007, Khalaji's lawyers sent a... read more » Last updated on May 5th, 2008 |
Browse by SubjectNavigation |
||
| Copyright 2007-2008 Citizen Media Law Project and respective authors. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License: Details. Use of this site is pursuant to our Terms of Use and Privacy Notice. |

Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati
On May 29, 2008, counsel for Internet Solutions Corporation and Alec Difrawi sent a cease-and-desist letter and email to Archie Garga-Richardson, the founder... read more »